![]() ![]() Here's the text, published by Vanity Fair (someone must have leaked it), and the signatories, who sent it to local union president Susan DeCarava: Now comes the cavalry from the newsroom itself, in the form of a letter signed by a number of Times journalists, including some big names, attacking the newspaper's union representatives for supporting the indefensible attack on journalism represented by the crybullies' demands. And so the Times leadership did, bless them. Maybe, just maybe, the people who run the newsroom have grasped an important lesson from the Summer of Floyd: that if you surrender to the woke mob within the institution, there will be no end to the capitulations that will be demanded of you. Rather than falling all over themselves to placate the woke crybullies, Times leadership issued a public statement defending its standards, and defending the practice of actual journalism. Nevertheless, deviating even one millimeter from the Narrative was a cultural atrocity in the minds of LGBT activists and allies, hence their public denunciation of the Times.īut then a curious thing happened. It's late - the story in Europe been far more gender-critical for longer - but it's still welcome. As a regular reader and subscriber to the Times, I agree that the Times's coverage of all things trans has been weighted in one direction: towards the celebratory! But lately, the paper has been more balanced, publishing data-driven stories questioning the official Narrative. ![]() You may recall last week's controversy in which a huge number of NYT contributors, and some journalists who work there, signed an open letter denouncing the Times for its coverage supposedly biased against transgendered people. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |